Technology · Regulation
Regulation, handled proportionately.
If you deploy AI in your business, you are accountable for how it behaves. That principle now runs through the EU AI Act and the frameworks emerging alongside it, and we think it is the right principle: it is how we build anyway. Renaix systems are designed so that the controls regulation expects are properties of the system itself, not paperwork produced after the fact.
How we handle it
We work out what applies before we build.
You do not need to turn regulation into a technical specification. We assess the workflow, identify the rules that may apply, build the necessary safeguards into the system, and keep checking them while it runs.
- 01
Understand the workflow
We establish what the system will do, who its decisions may affect, and what happens if it gets something wrong.
- 02
Check what applies
We determine its risk category and the requirements that may come with it. Where legal interpretation is needed, we work with your qualified advisers.
- 03
Build in the safeguards
Access controls, source evidence, human review, approvals, and logs are matched to the consequence of the workflow.
- 04
Keep it current
We document important decisions, test changes before release, and monitor the system while it operates.
Risk tiers
Where your use case sits: the EU AI Act in four tiers.
Other / lower-risk uses
Many internal business workflows do not fall into the AI Act’s high-risk categories. They may still be subject to transparency, data protection or sector-specific requirements depending on how the system is used.
Transparency obligations
Certain AI uses carry specific transparency duties. These include systems that interact directly with people, and particular categories of AI-generated or manipulated content. The exact obligation depends on whether you are the provider or deployer and on how the system is used.
High risk
A full compliance regime: risk management, data governance, technical documentation, human oversight, accuracy monitoring, conformity assessment. Applies to specific uses such as creditworthiness, recruitment screening, or insurance claim decisions. We tell you before a workflow enters this tier, and we scope the obligations into the engagement or advise against the use case.
Prohibited
Practices banned outright, such as social scoring or exploiting vulnerable groups. We do not build them.
The EU AI Act classifies systems by the risk of their use, not by the technology inside them, and the framework continues to develop. Treat the summary above as orientation: the tier for a specific workflow is established during the diagnostic and confirmed with qualified counsel wherever obligations attach.
Controls and architecture
The controls are already in the architecture.
Regulation maps onto controls already present in the system.
| Regulatory concern | System capability |
|---|---|
| Accountability / oversight | Human decision points and approval gates |
| Evidence / record keeping | Traceable outputs and logged workflow state |
| Data governance | Explicit access and data boundaries |
| Technical documentation | Versioned architecture and operating documentation |
| Ongoing performance | Evaluation, monitoring and controlled change |
What technology cannot guarantee by itself.
No architecture makes an organization compliant by itself. Compliance depends on the use case, jurisdiction, organizational responsibilities, and how the system is operated. Renaix provides inspectable controls, evidence, documentation, and monitoring that support those obligations.
What we do commit to: honest tier classification, controls proportionate to consequence, the documentation and evidence your advisers and auditors need, and a system whose behavior can be inspected rather than asserted.
Not legal advice. This page is general information about how Renaix systems are built and operated. It is not legal advice, and it does not establish the obligations that apply to your business. Where a workflow carries regulatory obligations, involve qualified legal counsel.